Slavs and Tatars 斯拉夫與韃靼
Most writing about Slavs and Tatars is hagiographic. Catalogue essays describe their research cycles in reverential terms, and magazine profiles home in on their geographical ruminations and visual puns. The collective and their collaborators make all of this easy precisely because they are articulate, having published more than a dozen books and much more ephemera. That has a cost. When a practice is primarily described through its own terms, some questions go unasked. What does it mean to aestheticise syncretism for a predominantly western audience? Does the collective’s strategic unlocatability – not here, not there – resolve anything, or does it simply make irresolution appear to be philosophy? And who exactly is the region “east of the former Berlin Wall, west of the Great Wall of China” being made legible for? There was a hint of an answer in a conversation hosted at the M+ Lounge featuring Payam Sharifi, one of the founders of the collective, in March. He described books as talismans, adding that the reason why Slavs and Tatars have pursued publishing as …









